kink exploration vs bottoming

Saturday, September 1st, 2007 · 3 Comments

I’m having a tough time knowing what direction to take this “relationship” with Joy. Thinking and talking about it this week, I come to two conclusions: one, she isn’t what I’m looking for (a bottom), and what I’m looking for is out there. Two, she is incredibly hot in bed, she’s GGG, and there’s so much I want to explore sexually for which I think she’d be game.

But: can I really explore what I want to explore sexually with someone who isn’t a bottom?

I’m not sure.

One specific thing that I want to play with and develop sexually is a top/bottom dynamic, and I don’t want to impose that on Joy - I want to be with someone who wants to explore that. That said, Joy and I are not exclusive, and perhaps I can explore things with Joy while still seeking someone else to explore the top/bottom dynamic with.

That brings up the question of whether or not the top/bottom dynamic is essential to my sex life … and, actually, it is important. It’s similar to the butch/femme identities: I used to think they were negotiable, but I know better now. They are a huge part of what I want to explore with another girl sexually.

So. Yes. That’s very important. And then the question becomes, will Joy be able to play with topping/bottoming enough that I’ll be satisfied? This, I think, remains to be known. I want someone who will submit, but I’m also very interested in exploring other kinky things …

And, also? My two (new) best friends (who will henceforth be referred to as the “That’s What She Said” gang because that joke is, somehow, still funny) and I were at Cattyshack last night, discussing picking up girls and fucking girls and who we would fuck and, yes, objectifying and sexualizing every girl in the bar, lord, we are capital-T-Trouble sometimes, and I realized at the end of the evening that no girl in there was as attractive to me as Joy.

That’s not something to let go of so easily, especially when she’s GGG, open, and fucken great in bed. There’s stuff to explore with her. Specifically kink.

LATER: I emailed Joy. Didn’t say much; I apologized for not being in contact this week, and asked if we could meet next week Wednesday or Thursday. Then, “I don’t think my appetite is yet satiated.” I’ve been kind of an asshole for not emailing her after our date on Tuesday (which I am writing up, don’t worry), but this week has been over-the-top busy. I hate that excuse, “I’ve been busy,” that’s crap. I think people make time for what’s important. But it’s actually very true in this instance, in that I needed a few days to re-think and re-examine and figure out how to go forward with this. There are a few conversations I need to have with Joy, but I think I’ve been setting the trejectory with the conversations we had last week, and I think I’m figuring out what I want.

File Under: a girl: Joy
Tags:

Related:

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Terroni // Sep 1, 2007 at 5:34 pm

    Yeah, the next step may be to figure out what she wants.

  • 2 M. Monkey // Sep 2, 2007 at 9:01 am

    Sorry, but what is GGG? I looked at the link but managed to miss it anyway… :/

  • 3 sinclair // Sep 2, 2007 at 9:09 am

    GGG - sorry that was unclear.

    it’s a term Dan Savage, the sex columnist, uses to talk about kinky sex and partnerships and exploration. To quote:

    Dan Savage and his readers often use the abbreviation GGG. This stands for “good, giving and game”, and generally refers to Mr. Savage’s ideal for healthy human sexuality: that a partner should be “good, giving and game” when presented with a person’s fantasy, however kinky or unusual. In his March 1, 2007 column, Savage summarized “GGG stands for ‘good, giving, and game,’ which is what we should all strive to be for our sex partners. Think ‘good in bed,’ ‘giving equal time and equal pleasure,’ and ‘game for anything—within reason.’”

Leave a Comment